Retirement Social Security

Workers Are Panicking Over Social Security Cuts - Here’s What the Official Forecast Says

The program is facing a funding shortfall by the early 2030s.

By David Maina, CPA , Edited by Laura Hohenstein

Updated May 20, 2026

Add Us On Google

Chances are, you have already come across the warnings that Social Security is running out of money and smaller checks could be ahead. And if those words have made you rethink your savings, pick up a side gig, or lose a little sleep over your stress-free retirement plans, you're far from alone.

About 6 in 10 retirees and half of workers are feeling the same unease, according to EBRI's 2026 Retirement Confidence Survey. But what people fear and what the official projections show are not quite the same thing, and the difference is worth understanding before making any big decisions.

Get a protection plan on all your appliances

Did you know if your air conditioner stops working, your homeowner’s insurance won’t cover it? Same with plumbing, electrical issues, appliances, and more.

A home warranty from Choice Home Warranty could pick up the slack where insurance falls short.

For a limited time, you can get your first month free with a Single Payment home warranty plan.

Get a free quote

How close the funding deadline really is

Every year, the Social Security Board of Trustees publishes a report on the program's finances. The 2025 edition projected that the retirement trust fund holds enough to pay full benefits through 2033. After that, incoming payroll taxes would cover only about 77% of what's owed, if nothing changes.

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) puts that date a year earlier, at 2032, partly because of recent tax changes. This includes the new $6,000 deduction for seniors, which is projected to reduce revenue flowing into the program.

Both estimates point to the early-to-mid 2030s, and without a legislative fix, that is when checks would start coming up short.

Shopping for cheaper auto insurance? Enter your zip code here to get started.

What 77% of your benefit actually looks like

For a retiree expecting $2,000 a month, 77% means roughly $1,540. That $460 monthly gap, stretched over a year, can add up to about $5,500 less in your pocket.

If the trust fund runs short and Congress has not stepped in, that reduction would hit checks across the board. The size of the loss would change from person to person, but the percentage cut would be the same.

Why the loss could feel bigger than it sounds

Your monthly check is probably stretched a bit tighter than the official numbers can make it seem. Medicare Part B premiums, which get deducted directly from Social Security payments, jumped to $202.90 a month in 2026. That was an $18 increase over the prior year.

The average cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) added about $56 a month, which left closer to $38 after the Part B increase was taken out.

These steady costs have been chipping away at take-home Social Security income for years, and a future benefit cut would only add to that pressure.

If you’re over 50, take advantage of massive discounts and financial resources

Over 50? Join AARP today— because if you’re not a member you could be missing out on huge perks. When you start your membership today, you can get discounts on things like travel, meal deliveries, eyeglasses, prescriptions that aren’t covered by insurance and more.

Start your membership by creating an account here and filling in all of the information (Do not skip this step!) Doing so will allow you to take up 25% off your AARP membership, making it just $15 the first year with auto-renewal.

The payroll tax side of the equation

Most of the conversation around Social Security's shortfall focuses on benefit cuts, but Congress has another option that doesn't touch your check at all, or at least not directly. Payroll taxes could be raised instead, and depending on how it's done, the cost would be absorbed by workers and employers rather than retirees.

Social Security is funded by a 12.4% payroll tax split evenly between workers and employers, applied to wages up to $184,500. To close the full gap through that tax alone, each side's rate would need to rise by roughly 1.5 to 2 percentage points.

On a $60,000 salary, a 1.5% increase means about $900 more per year, which is manageable for some households, but it can be a real squeeze for others.

Other fixes could include:

Raising or removing the cap on taxable earnings so wages above $184,500 are taxed too.
Adjusting the formula used to calculate cost-of-living increases, which would slow benefit growth over time without technically cutting anyone's check.
Raising the full retirement age (FRA) for younger workers by a year or two.

When Congress tackled this in 1983, the final package pulled from several of these levers at once, and the next fix could probably look similar.

What you can actually do about it

A good starting point is pulling up your Social Security statement and looking at your projected benefit at different claiming ages. Take about 20% off each number, then ask whether those reduced figures would still cover your fixed monthly costs like housing, food, and medications.

If they would, you are in a fairly resilient position. If they wouldn't, that gap is worth addressing now, not after 2032.

Delaying your claim is one of the more effective ways to widen that cushion. For every year you wait past your full retirement age, your monthly benefit grows by about 8%, up to age 70.

On a projected $2,000 benefit at 67, waiting until 70 bumps it to roughly $2,480. Even after a hypothetical 23% cut, that delayed benefit would come out to around $1,910, which is still close to what the original unreduced amount would have been.

Not everyone has the luxury of waiting, and claiming early makes sense when cash is needed now. But if you're on the fence about timing and your health is reasonable, the math on delaying can be hard to beat.

Bottom line

Social Security's trust fund has a real funding problem, and the timeline is closer than many people realize. But the most likely outcome is some version of legislative fix that combines tax increases with gradual benefit adjustments, not a sudden 23% cut overnight.

For now, your checks are safe. But the bigger question is how well you're positioned if the rules change, and the answer depends on whether you make the right moves in the years between now and then. Small adjustments, like delaying your claim and budgeting for Medicare costs, can make a real difference by the time Congress acts.

More from FinanceBuzz: