A retiree expecting a $2,000 monthly Social Security check could face a $440 reduction in 2032 if Congress doesn't address the program's looming funding shortfall.
The latest projections show the trust fund responsible for retirement and survivor benefits running out of reserves in late 2032, leaving enough incoming revenue to cover only 78% of scheduled benefits.
A reduction of that size could make it harder for retirees living on just Social Security, which is why Sens. Bill Cassidy and Dick Durbin are among a bipartisan group trying to force Congress to act before then.
Get a protection plan on all your appliances
Did you know if your air conditioner stops working, your homeowner’s insurance won’t cover it? Same with plumbing, electrical issues, appliances, and more.
A home warranty from Choice Home Warranty could pick up the slack where insurance falls short.
For a limited time, you can get your first month free with a Single Payment home warranty plan.
A $2,000 Social Security benefit could fall to $1,560
A 22% reduction would turn a scheduled $2,000 monthly benefit into $1,560, a loss of $440 per month or $5,280 over a year. Someone expecting $3,000 per month would be looking at a $660 monthly difference, while a scheduled $1,500 benefit would be $330 lower.
Those aren't cuts that have already been approved, and Social Security isn't expected to stop paying benefits. The figures show what could happen under current law if lawmakers allow the retirement trust fund's reserves to run out without closing the gap between incoming revenue and scheduled benefits.
Social Security's retirement fund could run short in 2032
Social Security primarily finances benefits through payroll taxes collected from workers and employers. Trust fund reserves have helped cover the difference when costs exceed income, but those reserves are being depleted.
The 2026 Social Security Trustees Report projects that the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund will run out of reserves in the fourth quarter of 2032, one quarter earlier than projected in 2025. At that point, ongoing income would still cover about 78% of scheduled retirement and survivor benefits.
Cassidy and Durbin want to force Congress to act
Cassidy and Durbin are among a bipartisan group backing the Protecting Retirement Opportunities and Maintaining Income Security for Everyone (PROMISE) Act. The bill is also supported by Sens. Thom Tillis, Tim Kaine, John Cornyn, Angus King, and Alan Armstrong.
Both Cassidy and Durbin are approaching the end of their Senate careers, and the pair have made tackling Social Security's finances one of their final major legislative efforts.
Rather than immediately raising taxes or cutting benefits, the legislation would require the bipartisan Social Security Advisory Board to gather public input and draft legislation capable of keeping the retirement trust fund solvent for at least 50 years.
If you’re over 50, take advantage of massive discounts and financial resources
Over 50? Join AARP today— because if you’re not a member you could be missing out on huge perks. When you start your membership today, you can get discounts on things like travel, meal deliveries, eyeglasses, prescriptions that aren’t covered by insurance and more.
Start your membership by creating an account here and filling in all of the information (Do not skip this step!) Doing so will allow you to take up to 25% off your AARP membership, making it just $15 the first year with auto-renewal.
The PROMISE Act would create a path for Congress
The resulting proposal would then go to Congress, where the Senate Finance Committee and House Ways and Means Committee could debate and amend it. Final passage would still require three-fifths support in the Senate and a simple majority in the House.
Cassidy has argued that lawmakers' reluctance to take politically difficult votes is part of the reason a new process is needed. "For some people, the time to do Social [Security] is never. Don't disturb Congress. They don't want to take a tough vote. Even if that vote only sets up a process," he said.
AARP worries the process could lead to benefit cuts
Not everyone agrees that creating a special process is the best way to fix Social Security. AARP, a nonprofit that advocates for Americans aged 50 and older, has opposed fast-track approaches that it believes could limit normal congressional debate and allow major Social Security changes without enough public scrutiny.
Its concern isn't that the PROMISE Act itself cuts benefits. Rather, the bill would create a process that produces a separate reform package whose contents aren't known yet. AARP argues that limiting debate and amendments could make benefit reductions easier to advance than under the usual legislative process.
Congress has several ways it could close the gap
Avoiding the projected reduction would require lawmakers to raise Social Security revenue, reduce future costs, or combine the two.
Some lawmakers want higher payroll taxes on top earners, while others have discussed changing benefits or investing government funds in higher-return assets. Cassidy and Sen. Tim Kaine, for example, have separately proposed a $1.5 trillion investment fund that would hold stocks and other assets.
Cassidy projects that the fund could cover about two-thirds of the roughly $26.6 trillion in borrowing otherwise needed over 75 years, reducing, rather than eliminating, the need for additional tax increases or benefit cuts.
None of those ideas has emerged as a consensus solution, which is why the PROMISE Act focuses on creating a process for reaching an agreement rather than prescribing one specific fix.
Retirement News: Almost 80% of Americans fear a retirement age increase — here’s the real reason why
Bottom line
Social Security isn't expected to disappear in 2032, but its retirement trust fund is projected to run out of reserves, which could leave only 78% of scheduled benefits payable if Congress doesn't act.
The PROMISE Act is one attempt to force a solution before then, though AARP worries about the process it would create. If you are a retiree or nearing retirement, you may still want to build some flexibility into your plans to stretch your retirement dollars further in case future changes affect expected benefits.
More from FinanceBuzz:
- Retire like the rich: 14 ways you could build wealth in your 50s.
- Find out if you could pay less for car insurance in just a few clicks.
- Make these 7 savvy moves when you have $1,000 in the bank.
- 14 moves seniors could benefit from but often forget about.
Add Us On Google