Retirement Retirement Planning

Where Would You Retire On $65K a Year? This State Came Up Again and Again

Find out where the right mix of low taxes and affordable housing is ideal for your retirement budget

Older couple walking outdoors
Updated April 25, 2026
Fact check checkmark icon Fact checked
Google Logo Add Us On Google info

If you had $65,000 a year to live on in retirement, where would you go? That's the question one Redditor asked in a widely debated thread in the Financial Independence, Retire Early (FIRE) sub. Retiring around age 60 on a fixed annual budget that lasts for decades is a scenario many Americans wish to make a reality.

At first glance, $65,000 sounds reasonable for a stress-free retirement. But as the thread revealed, it's either comfortable or tight, depending on where you live. And while several locations got attention, one state kept coming back again and again.

Get a protection plan on all your appliances

Did you know if your air conditioner stops working, your homeowner’s insurance won’t cover it? Same with plumbing, electrical issues, appliances, and more.

A home warranty from Choice Home Warranty could pick up the slack where insurance falls short.

For a limited time, you can get your first month free with a Single Payment home warranty plan.

Get a free quote

The scenario that sparked the debate

The user explained they were about 10 years out from retirement, targeting age 60, and trying to make a smart decision about where to settle. Based on their spending, they expected to need around $65,000 a year to cover their expenses.

Behind their question was a familiar FIRE mindset. The hypothetical retiree was seeking sustainability: living on a fixed budget in a place where that money could go the distance without constant financial stress.

This framing shifted the conversation away from dream destination and toward choosing the "right" place.

The big question: Where does $65K go furthest?

Besides offering clear answers, the thread also became a crowdsourced ranking of what actually matters in retirement.

Various users piped up with their list, which boils down to a few major themes. The ideal place for retirement would have low or no state income tax, affordable housing, manageable insurance costs, and accessible healthcare. Additionally, it would fit climate and lifestyle preferences. And quickly, patterns started to emerge.

Tennessee: The standout that kept coming up

As the replies rolled in, one recommendation stood out. Tennessee isn't flashy, which is exactly the point. If you're trying to make $65K work long-term, the state checks several boxes that matter more than pristine beaches or big-city energy.

One of the biggest advantages is the lack of a state income tax. For retirees living on withdrawals from retirement accounts or investment income, that can make a meaningful difference in how far their money goes in a year.

On top of that, as user Only-Confusion-4712 points out, Tennessee is a "really impressive state" because of its "extremely low property taxes, good weather, lots of greenery, history, and heritage," and reasonable housing costs.

This lifestyle balance also appeals to many seniors. A mild climate, free from some of the more extreme risks associated with coastal living, combined with the low cost of living, hits a practical sweet spot for retirees on fixed budgets.

Get a protection plan on all your appliances

Did you know if your air conditioner stops working, your homeowner’s insurance won’t cover it? Same with plumbing, electrical issues, appliances, and more.

Whether or not you’re a new homeowner, a home warranty from Choice Home Warranty could pick up the slack where insurance falls short and protect you against surprise expenses. If a covered system in your home breaks, you can call their hotline 24/7 to get it repaired.

For a limited time, you can get your first month free with a Single Payment home warranty plan.

Get a free quote

Florida: Popular, but with caveats

As is the norm with retirement discussions, Florida was a frequent suggestion. It has no income tax, which puts it on the radar for budget-conscious retirees. Warm weather and established retiree communities only compound the appeal.

Still, the tone of the discussion was cautious, as evidenced by user ctnypr1999's words: "Florida makes up for the no state income tax with very high taxes on everything else." Another Redditor chipped in: "Florida works [...] if you can handle hurricanes."

Those are valid concerns. Rising home insurance costs and storm-related risks have made Florida more expensive than many retirees expect.

Texas: Looks good… on paper

Unsurprisingly, Texas also entered the conversation as a tax-friendly option, thanks to its lack of a state income tax. But much like Florida, the fine print included higher property and sales taxes that quickly offset savings, especially for homeowners.

As Redditor Synaps4 put it: "Texans pay more through real estate taxes [...] than they would in a state with an income tax. It's a joke."

For someone working with a fixed $65K annual budget, those hidden costs matter. A lower tax bill in one area doesn't necessarily mean a low cost of living.

Pennsylvania: A sleeper pick

Pennsylvania was one of the most detailed recommendations in the thread.

User paq12x highlighted why Pennsylvania is "one of the best places to retire": no tax on retirement income (including withdrawals from retirement accounts), reasonable home prices, and strong health care systems ("The very best eye doctors are [...] in Philly.")

Their suggestion reinforced a broader point: the best retirement location is where your budget works.

Michigan: Low cost and natural beauty

Michigan, especially its northwestern part, was another compelling option. Redditors who suggested Michigan mentioned its lower cost of living, access to outdoor recreation, and fewer natural disasters than in coastal states.

The tradeoff? Winters. Always winters.

Nevada: Worth it, but lots of tradeoffs

User travelintel brought up yet another option: "Nevada is state-tax free, and I enjoy it." Other Redditors agreed with this sentiment, mentioning outdoor attractions and manageable property taxes.

However, others were quick to mention that health care is "horrible" and places like Reno are less than desirable, especially because of Nevada's focus on tourism and gambling.

The real takeaway: It's not just about taxes

One idea kept coming up across all these comments. Tax-friendly states are appealing, but only if the full cost picture makes sense. FIRE retirees aren't just looking at income tax. They're also weighing property taxes, insurance (especially in areas with extreme weather), social connections, accessible health care, and lifestyle fit.

The softer factors, such as proximity to family, also impact quality of life and, by extension, longevity.

Why Tennessee wins the conversation

When you step back and look at the full picture, Tennessee stands out because it avoids many of the tradeoffs that complicate other destinations.

It offers the tax advantage people are looking for without the same level of risk or hidden costs seen in places like Florida and Texas. It's affordable and practical without feeling extreme or sacrificing livability.

If you're planning to retire on $65K a year, that's hard to beat.

Bottom line

A $65,000 yearly retirement budget can go a long way, but only if you choose your location carefully. As this discussion shows, the best place to retire isn't always the most glamorous. So, if you've started to put together a retirement plan, look for places that let you live comfortably, predictably, and sustainably for the long term.

For a growing number of people thinking through that exact question, Tennessee may be the answer hiding in plain sight.

Zoe Financial Benefits
  • Get matched with vetted and fiduciary-certified financial advisors
  • Take the mystery out of retirement planning
  • Their matching tool is free


Financebuzz logo

Thanks for subscribing!

Please check your email to confirm your subscription.