8 SUVs With the Worst Fuel Mileage to Avoid in 2025

For years, SUVs have had a bad reputation as gas guzzlers. This has somewhat improved in recent years, but considering rising fuel prices and environmental concerns, fuel efficiency is on many more drivers' minds. That includes those looking for an SUV in 2025.

Here's a look at eight SUVs with poor gas mileage that could cost thousands more to fill up over the next few years. Avoiding such gas guzzlers could be among the smart money moves if you own a car.

With a combined fuel economy of 13 mpg, this high-performance SUV is fun to drive but not fuel-efficient. According to the EPA, the Durango Hellcat costs $7.62 to travel 25 miles, and its annual fuel cost is $4,550. It's also an old-school SUV. The manufacturer has discontinued just about every other vehicle that once used the same powertrain.

You may have been excited to discover that Ford refreshed the Expedition lineup this year. This large, family-friendly SUV offers a combined 17 mpg, making it a less efficient choice for those concerned with fuel costs. Your family may also not like the ride itself. Reviewers said the Expedition has truckish handling. In addition, some said it looks cheap inside.

A full-size SUV with a combined 16 mpg, it's another option for large families but falls short in fuel efficiency. You may find some other reasons not to buy this SUV. Reviewers said there's an occasional jittery ride quality. Plus, the engine may be louder than you desire when idle, and you may not find the space inside as favorable as some competitors.

Smart Drivers, Smarter Savings

Compare car insurance rates in your area

See if you qualify for a lower rate in less than 2 minutes

Check Rates

By clicking the button above I understand and agree that this site uses site visit recording technology (provided by Trusted Form, Jornaya, and Microsoft Clarity) Privacy Policy

This luxury SUV offers a combined 15 mpg, highlighting its opulence but poor fuel economy. Per the EPA, this SUV's annual fuel cost is $3,950. The EPA based the number on the assumption of 15,000 miles of driving each year, with 45% done on the highway and 55% on city streets.

If you're going to buy a Rolls-Royce, you might have a big enough bank account that you're not too worried about fuel costs. Still, the Cullinan has a combined 14 mpg. Like some others on our list of SUVs with the worst fuel mileage, this one is heavy and big on power. Those are some of the main reasons this one comes with poor fuel economy.

Like the GLS600, this performance coupe SUV checks in at a combined 15 mpg. Based on EPA information, you'll likely spend $11,500 more on fuel over five years than the average vehicle owner. That's not all: Like many luxury vehicles with powerful engines, you'll pay more for premium fuel.

This attention-grabbing ride has a combined 14 mpg. Its rugged boxy SUV styling is inspired by the Land Rover Defender, and it boasts a BMW engine. The poor fuel economy is likely due to several factors, including the boxy shape, which lacks aerodynamic qualities, and the weight of over 6,000 pounds.

This supercharged SUV gets a combined 13 mpg. You might think of it as a luxury family ride with a muscle car feel under the hood. However, its power and weight make for poor fuel economy. The EPA estimated that the Escalade-V will likely cost you an extra $14,500 in fuel over five years compared to the average vehicle.

You might want to consider fuel efficiency if you're looking for a new SUV in 2025. Some of those with the worst fuel mileage could cost you thousands of dollars over the next few years.

In addition to finding a reliable ride to save on car insurance, you could consider looking at similar vehicles from rivals to get the best bang for your buck on the road.